Posts

Submit your call to BAN Live Animal Export now!

ban

Submit your call to BAN Live Animal Export now!

THE MOMENT WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR HAS ARRIVED!

SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS AND MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD FOR OUR ANIMALS!

Thank you for previously taking the time to write a letter to the Minister of Agriculture calling for a ban on the export of live animals by sea.

Despite your appeal, and the appeals of many others, on the 11th of July 2025, our Minister of Agriculture released the draft Regulations for the Export of Live Animals by Sea, a deeply disappointing attempt to legitimise and prolong a trade that is inherently cruel and inhumane.
We know, and the evidence shows, that no amount of regulation can make this practice humane. It is not a matter of better oversight; it is a matter of fundamental animal welfare. The very nature of long-distance live export by sea causes immense and unavoidable suffering.

We ask you to please take a few moments to submit your comments on the draft regulations, and to CALL FOR A TOTAL BAN. The easiest way to submit your comments is via our campaign on the DearSA platform.

Those who wish to submit more detailed comments, may do so by following the instructions linked here.

It would also be hugely impactful if you would share this with your family and friends, and urge them to submit comments too. We need to stand together to end this cruelty for these helpless beings.

DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS : 25 AUGUST 12PM

Your support at this critical time would mean so much, not only to us, but to the countless animals whose lives hang in the balance.

Source: Cape Animal Welfare Forum

FOUR PAWS Calls on South Africa to Ban Live Animal Exports by Sea

Animal

FOUR PAWS Calls on South Africa to Ban Live Animal Exports by Sea

On Ban Live Exports International Awareness Day, advocates demand urgent government action

On Ban Live Exports International Awareness Day observed on 14 June, animal welfare organisation FOUR PAWS South Africa is calling on the Department of Agriculture (DOA) to stop the live export of animals by sea. Despite indisputable evidence of extreme cruelty, global momentum to end this trade, and mounting public opposition, the government has shown no intention to act accordingly.

“This practice is not only outdated and inhumane – it is also economically flawed and a threat to public and animal health. The time has come for South Africa to take a stand. Animals are suffering. The public is watching. The world is changing. We urge our government to show the leadership and compassion our laws and values demand.”

Fiona Miles, Director of FOUR PAWS South Africa

The case against live exports by sea

The suffering endured by animals exported by sea is harrowing and well-documented:

  • Weeks or months of travel enduring unbearable heat stress, high stocking densities, starvation, seasickness, dehydration, and poor ventilation.
  • Cramped and filthy conditions, with many animals dying during transit.
  • Survivors often face cruel slaughter methods at their destinations.
  • DOA’s guidelines for the Exportation of Live Animals by Sea are non-binding, and even binding regulations cannot be enforceable once the animals leave national borders, leaving animals vulnerable to cruelty at sea and at the destination country.
  • South Africa’s courts have recognised that animals are sentient beings, and that the government has an obligation to consider their welfare.

Global precedent

Other countries are showing the way:

  • New Zealand banned live exports by sea in 2022.
  • Australia has passed legislation to end live sheep exports by 2028.
  • The United Kingdom banned live exports for slaughter in 2024.

South Africa has the capacity to do the same, it only lacks the political will.

The economic argument falls apart

  • Chilled meat exports and local slaughter generate more jobs, higher GDP returns, and boost rural development.
  • Humane alternatives are not only possible, but they’re also profitable.

Transporting live animals over long distances increases the risk of zoonotic disease outbreaks, threatening both human and animal populations. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown how urgent it is to mitigate such risks. FOUR PAWS urges the DOA to:

  • Prohibit live exports by sea
  • Promote humane alternatives.
  • Fulfil its constitutional, legal and ethical duty to protect animals.

Let South Africa be a global leader in compassionate trade as the world marks Ban Live Exports International Awareness Day. FOUR PAWS calls on South Africa to lead with compassion, not cruelty. 

“The evidence is overwhelming. The alternatives are ready. The moral obligation is clear, South Africa must ban live animal exports by sea, now.”

Fiona Miles, Director of FOUR PAWS South Africa

Source: FOUR PAWS

4 Oct 2024 is World Animal Day!

Animal

4 Oct 2024 is World Animal Day!

World Animal Day exists to raise the status of animals and improve welfare standards around the globe. It’s a day of celebration for animal lovers like you and me everywhere. On October 4, it’s our chance to mobilise into a global force, to take action against animal cruelty, neglect and unfair treatment and make the world a better place for all animals.

Why October 4?

Well, it’s the feast day of St Francis of Assisi, the patron saint of animals, so what could be more fitting?

How can you support World Animal Day?

Global Animal Welfare Organisation, Four Paws, will be gathering outside Parliament in Cape Town on 4 October, for their “Bring Animal Welfare to Parliament” event, which will run from 09h30 – 13h00 (note you do not need to stay for the duration). Stop Live Export SA will be attending this event and we’d love you, our supporters, to join us.

Click here to register (it’s free). Bring “Stop Live Animal Export” banners with if possible.

Source: STOP LIVE EXPORT

Export horror continues

Export horror continues

Export horror continues

Since 17th July 2023 teams of Inspectors have been in the Eastern Cape inspecting another shipment of 49 000 animals destined for export by sea, being housed at the Page Farming Trust feedlot, Eastern Cape and exported by Al Mawashi and Livestock Transport and Trading Company PSC (KLTT), fully supported by the SA Government and the Red Meat Industry Forum.

They have not adhered to the Governments “Guidelines for the Exportation of Live Animals by Sea”. At the feedlot the Inspectors found significant animal welfare concerns including: the pelleted food for the sheep had run out; obviously pregnant ewes, new-born lambs from those sheep who had given birth as well as aborted young, they had not been scanned to determine pregnancy. Other compromised animals including lame sheep, sheep with foot rot, pink eye throughout the pens and emaciated and moribund sheep.

The Government, State Veterinary Department failed to uphold their ‘Guidelines’, the Exporter failed to adhere the ‘Guidelines’ and still the exporter advised us, that regardless,  loading would commence on 20 July 2023 onto the Al Messilah vessel.

In this dire situation, to halt the loading of animals until the guidelines were adhered to, on 19/7/2023 the NSPCA applied for an Urgent High Court Interdict in the Grahamstown High Court. Despite these appalling conditions of the animals at the feedlot and a well set out case, the Acting Judge did not hear the merits of the matter and only heard argument on urgency. The loading was then permitted to commence on 20/7/2023.

Regardless of enormous challenges and personal sacrifice,  the NSPCA Inspectors are still at the feedlot and harbour, doing their utmost to prevent suffering to these animals. It has taken enormous physical and mental toll on the 16 inspectors who have been working 12 hours daily, and yet we still have no confirmed departure date. “The accommodation, fuel and welfare costs of keeping the Inspectorate team on site are escalating daily. But while these animals are on South African soil, we will not leave them” Marcelle Meredith, Executive Director, NSPCA.

The NSPCA has pending cruelty cases and while waiting for the cases to be heard in court the suffering is ongoing. Please support us in ending the cruelty once and for all. Further updates to follow.

Export horror continues

Source: SPCA

Looking for a SPCA near you?
Have a look at our SPCA Directory listing!

South African Veterinary (SAVA) Statement on the Welfare of Livestock Transported by Sea

SAVA

South Africa, Johannesburg, 06 August 2020: The South African Veterinary Association (SAVA) is a voluntary organisation representing veterinarians in South Africa. Our approximately 2100 members come from all fields within the veterinary profession and represent both clinical as well as government regulatory aspects. SAVA notes with concern the on-board welfare of live animals transported by sea for the exclusive purpose of slaughter at destination from South Africa to the Middle East. SAVA supports sustainable and profitable livestock farming, but this must happen in conjunction with positive animal welfare.

The OIE is the intergovernmental organisation responsible for improving global animal health and welfare. South Africa is a signatory to the OIE’s Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Chapter 7.2 of this Code recommends how the process of live exportation should protect animal welfare. However, the OIE Code is only a set of guidelines to ensure that basic principles are taken into consideration when member countries develop and implement standards. It sets out the responsibilities of the different role players but does not enforce minimum welfare standards on board these ships. Unlike issues relating to disease, the standards or “guidelines” for welfare carry no sanction. It is also worth noting OIE guidelines are generically created and local circumstances may not be properly considered.

The OIE Code states that “welfare of the animals during their journey is the paramount consideration and is the joint responsibility of all people involved1”. It is the responsibility of the competent authority of the exporting country to establish the minimum standards for animal welfare during loading of the animals and for the duration of the journey. In South Africa, this competent authority is the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD). Both the setting and monitoring of welfare standards for live animal exports by sea are currently lacking in South Africa.

South Africa may lack the capacity for thorough regulation in some regards, however this does not mean that regulations should be ignored. The minimum animal welfare standards are legislated by the Animals Protection Act (Act 71 of 1962). The Act is legally binding and expressly states in Clause 2(m) that any person who “conveys, carries, confines… any animal… in conditions affording inadequate shelter, light or ventilation or in which such animal is excessively exposed to heat, cold, weather, sun, rain, dust, exhaust gases or noxious fumes; or without making adequate provision for suitable food, potable water and rest2”, as well as any person who causes, procures or assists in the above, is liable for prosecution.

Investigations by the NSPCA, as well as reports from well-established independent bodies within the production animal industry in both South Africa and Australia (e.g. Livestock Welfare Coordinating Committee), have condemned the practices surrounding live exportation by sea. The Australian Veterinary Association has raised fundamental concerns with heat stress risk and compliance with the Australian Standards3–5 during these shipments.

Findings include:

  • Severe logistical challenges surrounding the transportation from production sites to the loading site leaves room for errors, such as predisposition to injury and overlooking the loading of unsuitable animals e.g. pregnant or ill animals.
  • High prevalence of diarrhoea and anorexia6 shows that many animals do not adapt properly to the food provided on board, losing body condition and often dying during the journey.
  • High stocking densities makes it impossible to properly inspect thousands of animals daily for behaviour and health problems, as is recommended by the OIE Code.
  • Animals were unable to lie down to rest and cannot easily reach food and water troughs7. Ship movement on waves also makes sheep uncomfortable8.
  • The double-deck design of the ship leads to faecal soiling of food and water troughs on lower levels by animals on higher levels. This contributes to reluctance to eat and the faecal-oral transmission of diseases such as salmonella6.
  • Slippery floors and gaps between decks predispose animals to injuries.
  • Build-up of waste matter combined with poor ventilation resulted in unacceptably high concentrations of ammonia in the air.
  • Hot weather, high stocking density and high ammonia levels contribute to heat stress. Sheep were documented to cluster around fans with open-mouthed breathing, depressed disposition and respiratory rates faster than 100 bpm9,10.

Additional independent observers should be present on board to support the existing veterinary services. Animals are recognised as sentient beings by the South African Constitutional Court and by the OIE. Currently, in South Africa as well as other countries, welfare is often erroneously measured solely by the number of mortalities during the voyage. All of the above findings are considered severe infringements on animal health and welfare and can cause extended suffering and death if not treated immediately and resolved. Animal welfare is often severely compromised long before the point of mortality, and low mortalities should not necessarily be equated with high welfare standards.

Arguments in favour of live export are commonly erroneously based on the concept that religious beliefs of the destination country demand on-site slaughter for consumption. The Muslim Judicial Council Halaal Trust (MJCHT) issued a press statement reiterating its concern for the welfare of animals, stating that the South African government “could not provide the necessary safety conditions for the animals on sea-vessels.”  According to the MJCHT, animals which are not transported in good physical condition cannot be considered Halaal for slaughter11. South Africa has no jurisdiction over how the animals are slaughtered at their destination. Regulations or the enforcement thereof may be minimal, leaving animals to an uncertain and potentially inhumane fate. Slaughter must therefore be conducted at a Halaal abattoir in South Africa, where it can be properly regulated.

SAVA recognises animals as sentient beings that are capable of experiencing both positive and negative states. Fiscal interests of individual exporting stakeholders must not take precedence over the health and welfare of the animals being exported. SAVA supports calls for improved legislation protecting animal welfare within South Africa which will protect our ‘Proudly South African’ reputation, safeguarding the interests of all sentient beings. Until such legislation has been developed and is fully enforced, SAVA is of the opinion that as a humane alternative, sheep and other livestock destined for export for the purpose of slaughter at their destination should rather be slaughtered in South African abattoirs which comply with international religious and cultural (Halaal) regulations. Animals should be slaughtered as close to the site of production as possible, in a manner that will uphold South Africa’s rightful pride in the quality of our meat.

References:

  1. Norris RT. Transport of animals by sea. OIE Rev Sci Tech [Internet]. 2005;24(2):673–81. Available from: https://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahc/current/chapitre_aw_sea_transpt.pdf
  2. South Africa. Animals Protection Act 71/1962 [Internet]. Government Gazette, 71/1962 Pretoria, South Africa: South African Government; 1962. Available from: http://www.gov.za/sites/www.gov.za/files/Act 71 of 1962.pdf
  3. Department of Agriculture F and F. Australian Standards for the Export of Livestock (Version 2.3) 2011. 2011;17, 106. Available from: http://www.daff.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/1904365/australian-standards-v2.3.pdf
  4. Australian Veterinary Association Ltd. A short review of space allocation on live export ships and body temperature regulation in sheep. 2018 [Internet]. 2018;(May). Available from: https://www.google.com/search?q=A+short+review+of+space+allocation+on+live+export+ships+and+body+temperature+regulation+in+sheep&rlz=1C1CHFX_enAU897AU897&oq=A+short+review+of+space+allocation+on+live+export+ships+and+body+temperature+regulation+in+sheep&a
  5. Australian Veterinary Association Ltd. Heat Stress Risk Assessment Issues Paper VALE Submission October 2018. 2018;(October).
  6. Richards RB, Norris RT, Dunlop RH, McQuade NC. Causes of death in sheep exported live by sea. Aust Vet J. 1989;66(2):33–8.
  7. Australia 60 Minutes. Sheep, ships and videotape: Part one. 2018.
  8. Santurtun E, Moreau V, Marchant-Forde JN, Phillips CJC. Physiological and behavioral responses of sheep to simulated sea transport motions. J Anim Sci. 2015;93(3):1250–7.
  9. Carnovale F, Phillips CJC. The effects of heat stress on sheep welfare during live export voyages from Australia to the middle east. Animals. 2020;10(4).
  10. Pines MK, Phillips CJC. Microclimatic conditions and their effects on sheep behavior during a live export shipment from Australia to the Middle East. J Anim Sci. 2013;91(9):4406–16.
  11. MJCHT. Protect The Rights Of Animals, Don’t Export live [Internet]. Muslim Judicial Council Halaal Trust. 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 8]. Available from: https://mjchalaaltrust.co.za/protect-the-rights-of-animals-dont-export-live/

Source: SAVA

How South Africa illegally sells thousands of animals per year to China revealed

How South Africa illegally sells thousands of animals per year to China revealed

The animals, such as monkeys, cheetahs, rhinos and meerkats, are poached from their wild habitats under legal export claims, the investigation found. The researchers added that the animals are then used in circuses, theme parks, laboratories and zoos.

The report says at least 5,035 live wild animals were exported to China from 2016 to last year in “an extremely conservative” estimation.

This figure includes chimpanzees and “a bewildering number” of giraffes, which “are also eaten in China”.

Some traders have connections to international organised crime associations and the system has full access to fake permits, yet not a single culprit has been prosecuted.

Upon arrival to China, where captive-animal welfare laws are “non-existent”, the animals often go missing or disappear, suggesting they either died or where sold on, the research found.

In a growing business, “treating wildlife as if it is merely a commodity to be farmed” risks “unleashing myriad Covid-type diseases”.

The South Africa-based organisations Ban Animal Trading (BAT) and the charitable EMS Foundation, which observed wild animal exports from 2016 to 2019, criticised at the reported myth that legal trade overruns the illegal trade and that animals are looked after in legitimate purchases.

“The legal and illegal trade are so intertwined as to be functionally inseparable,” the report states.

“The research demonstrates that South Africa’s live wild animal trade with China is riddled with irregularities that are exploited by traffickers.

“There are gaping loopholes in the global permitting, enforcement and oversight system.”

“Regulation is “failing dismally, imparting a false sense of security for those who believe that the international trade in wildlife is justified and sustainable.

“Such security is wildly misplaced and, far from contributing to conservation, the legal trade is one of the single biggest factors currently undermining conservation.”

Zoos, brokers and wholesale companies, contribute to wild animal trafficking, as they are delivered to destinations that are often fake.

Zoos, brokers and wholesale companies, contribute to wild animal trafficking

Most permits are in breach of regulations, and they lack authentication, meaning most wild animal exports in 2016-19 were probably illicit, according to the researchers.

The two teams analysed the extent of South Africa’s trade with Beijing by visiting the supposed destinations, inspecting licences and examining data from the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species.

“Our investigation of theme parks and zoos revealed that nearly all trained primates are not bred in captivity, but were wild-caught and illegally traded out of Africa and Indonesia,” according to the study.

The report also says South African exotic primate breeders trade hundreds of marmosets to Chinese laboratories or breeding farms each year.

The research teams said chimp trade breached various regulations, but there were no prosecutions.

Over 100 South African giraffes were sent to a Chinese zoo that holds the world record for having the highest number of hybrid animals “which have zero conservation value”.

However a global policy of paper export permits allows for ubiquitous fraud, with recurring false allegations by traders, agents and exporters, the report revealed.

The research adds that “once animals leave South Africa it is impossible to identify where they will land up.”

The South African claims that rhino horn trade is subject to stringent regulations including documentation.

Zimbabwe is also involved in wildlife trade to Asia and has frequently exported young elephants to zoos in China since 2012 – 108 in all, according to Humane Society International.

By MELANIE KAIDAN
Source: Express.co.uk

South Africa – World’s Biggest Exporter Of Live Endangered Animals

Image: Pixabay

South Africa is facing an unprecedented crisis in the animal export industries. In the last 14 years the country legally exported more than 10,000 live, endangered mammals, making it officially the world’s number one exporter of endangered wildlife species.

The latest Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species in Wild Fauna and Flora report states that the booming industry made commercial sales in excess of R19,7 billion, but conservation bodies say the trend is becoming a significant threat to the survival of the continent’s wildlife than poaching.

“This continues the breeding of captive animals for the pet trade. They (breeders) remove them, hand-rear them, when they start breeding them again, they do the same thing. It’s just fuelling the trade and there’s a lot of abuse that takes place,” says senior inspector Isabel Wentzel, manager of the wildlife protection unit at the NSPCA.

“There’s a lot of internal trade with these things inside Africa where its out of hand and nobody actually knows the extent of it,” said Wentzel.

Globally, the most exported animal overall is the African Green Monkey, a popular pet, with over half finding themselves in Russia — the biggest importer of animals.

“Those of us troubled by this data must understand that Africa’s legitimate economic and cultural imperatives drive these exports — and frequently poaching as well — and that stopping them is not simple. For one thing, the income derived from animal exports would have to be replaced.” Says Big Think analyst Robyn Berman.

AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION

Written by: Garreth Van Niekerk
Source: Huffpost

Exotic animals in Gauteng: Pretty, but seriously risky

(Jens Buettner/dpa via AP)

If the pets themselves don’t get you, their parasites just might.

Thousands of Gauteng suburban dwellers are gambling with their safety and health by keeping exotic or wild animals on their properties.

Owners of large cats, such as tigers and lions, run the risk of getting attacked by them, and some of the animals carry diseases and parasites that pose serious health risks to humans and other animals.

They are feeding a multimillion-rand illegal animal trade industry which imports, exports and distributes animals most people have only seen in nature reserves and the wild.

The Citizen is aware of at least six homes in Joburg alone where tigers, lions, meerkats, tortoises, vervet monkeys, caracals, mongoose and African rock pythons are kept as pets.

A white lion cub bought on the black market could set you back R50 000, according to sources in the booming industry, while a Bengal tiger can cost R20 000.

An animal trader, who did not want to be named, told The Citizen that vervet monkeys were one of the most popular wild animals for Joburg’s elite, selling for about R4 000 for a “baby”.

“Usually it’s people with lodges and people who can’t have kids because they are a lot like children. Then you also get a lot of gay couples who approach me.”

The animals are popular in the underground trade, despite it being illegal to keep one as a pet. Keeping wild animals as pets in residential areas is not only a safety hazard but a public health risk, according to experts.

The CEO of the Captured Africa Foundation, Drew Abrahamson, said the growing acceptance of people living with exotic and wild animals was symptomatic of the country’s lack of capacity to effectively deal with wild animal populations.

“There are more than 8 000 lions in captivity in this country alone. The 270 breeding farms form part of this figure as well as animal sanctuaries and other conservation facilities. There are only a handful of good sanctuaries and they only get issued with permits for a limited number of lions and, unfortunately, they can’t go over that limit.”

Keeping wild animals as pets poses a danger to humans.

“Cats have so many parasites that can make you gravely ill. They are often riddled with worms, so if you take your kids to go and pet cubs, they run a heavy risk of contracting tapeworms that can burrow into your intestines and literally eat you from the inside out.”

Smaragda Louw, of animal rights lobby group Ban Animal Trading, said the scale at which wild animals from South Africa were being sold locally and overseas was threatening several endangered and indigenous animals.

She said South Africa was the largest exporter of exotic animals such as the African grey parrot and was known as a source of lion cubs for other African countries, such as Libya.

Martie Rossouw, manager of the wildlife unit at the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, said: “Our biggest concern is for the welfare of these animals. Most often these animals are bought on a whim and their owners have no idea how to care for them. Wild animals are highly sensitive to stress.”

She said incorrect diet, handling and husbandry by inexperienced and unknowledgeable owners often led to the animals’ welfare and mental and physical wellbeing being severely compromised.

Source: The Citizen
Simnikiweh@citizen.co.za